The Use of Conference Diplomacy in Conflict Prevention | United Nations (2023)

Skip to main content

UN Chronicle

  • Home
  • About us
  • Search
  • Chronicle Conversations
  • Archives »
    • Article archives
    • Issue archives
  • Contact
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)

The Use of Conference Diplomacy in Conflict Prevention | United Nations (2)

About the author

Abiodun Williams

Abiodun Williams is President of The Hague institute for Global Justice, the Netherlands.

(Video) Negotiations In Foreign Policy | Model Diplomacy

December 2014, No. 3 Vol. LI, Conference Diplomacy

For those seized with the imperative of preventing deadly conflict, the “peace conference” has many assets as part of the diplomatic toolbox. It allows focused attention to the issue at hand, brings together all relevant actors—ideally in a neutral setting and by a trusted convener—and fosters both momentum as well as a clear deadline for action.

“Conference diplomacy” may strike us as a relatively recent innovation, coterminous with the development of modern multilateralism and the growing recognition of global interconnectedness. Yet as we mark the bicentennial of the Congress of Vienna, we are reminded of previous attempts to maintain order (if not to promote justice) by an “international community”. Moreover, a lack of historical perspective would be reminiscent of Prince Klemens von Metternich’s right-hand man, Friedrich von Gentz, who in proclaiming that the 1815 Congress was “a phenomenon without precedent in the history of the world”,1 ignored the many peace conferences convened by the city-states of Renaissance Italy, and in the intervening centuries.2

Three Types of Conference Diplomacy

There are three types of conferences that contribute to conflict prevention. The first is the peace conference that either follows a major conflict, or is held to negotiate an end to one. Examples include the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, and the Peace of Westphalia of 1648, and more recently, the Geneva I Conference and the Geneva II Conference, which have sought to bring an end to the Syrian civil war. Such conferences can contribute to conflict prevention by providing a forum for negotiation over the terms of a conflict’s conclusion, as well as laying the ground for the development of sustainable peace.

Another type of conference focuses on promoting general peace throughout the world, or at least efforts to mitigate and regulate the occurrence of conflict. The First Hague Conference of 1899 and the Second Hague Conference of 1907 are emblematic of such initiatives. These conferences sought to contribute to conflict prevention by clarifying the jus ad bellum (and also the jus in bello), and promoting procedures for the peaceful arbitration of conflict. A modern analogy is found in the Rome Conference that presaged the establishment of the International Criminal Court, which has a mandate to investigate, charge and try those suspected of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes worldwide.

Lastly, conference diplomacy is conducted at the so-called “global conferences”, which took root in the 1960s and henceforth spread in quantity, although not necessarily in quality.3 Such conferences have a more indirect effect on conflict prevention. Even while pursuing specific aims in and of themselves, they serve an underlying or supplementary purpose of tackling the root causes of conflict, such as environmental degradation, poverty and cultural misunderstandings.

Development and Practice of Peace Conferences

The roots of peace conferences can be traced to fifteenth century efforts to end the wars that had ravaged the Italian peninsula, and through subsequent centuries the mechanism was intermittently used to put an end to protracted and widespread war, as at Westphalia. It was not, however, until the Congress of Vienna that conference diplomacy was employed self-consciously as a new instrument of international organization. The Congress—and Concert of Europe that emerged from it—was a prototypical example of a conference designed to manage the end of a war and to facilitate a general peace in its wake. Informed, as it was, by the political presumptions of its time, namely the salience of great power politics and the conspicuous rejection of universality or sovereign equality,4 its rationale was nevertheless informed by assumptions similar to those which lead modern conferences to be convened.

While other nineteenth century conferences followed the lead of Vienna, particularly the Congress of Berlin of 1878, which aimed to prevent conflict between the European powers, and in so doing partitioned the wider world without regard for self-determination of colonized territories, a trend towards greater inclusivity was in evidence at The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907. Inspired by conferences in the Americas that were held after the first Congress of Panama organized in 1826 by Simón Bolívar, The Hague conferences featured procedural innovations, which included more inclusive membership.5 During this period, there was a call among participants for an institutionalization of the process. The League of Nations, following the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, made a serious attempt to do so.6 It made permanent diplomatic consultation to mediate conflict one of its primary goals and as such, informed by the practice of the preceding decades, took over much of the work of peace conferences and absorbed it into its model of parliamentary diplomacy.7

The development of an international norm around conference diplomacy is illustrated by the presumption, following the failure of the League and the conclusion of the Second World War, that a new conference ought to be held with the aim of establishing a new organization to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war”. With the United Nations, the world once again had a major global governance institution that could employ its organizational capacities to prevent conflict. The appeal of conferences outside institutional auspices continued, however, with a number of issues deemed inappropriate for consideration within the United Nations itself. Examples include the conferences on South-East Asia (Laos and Viet Nam) throughout the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, and the talks on the Middle East (including the Geneva Conference on the Middle East, held in 1973) and Cyprus (London Conference on Cyprus, held in 1959).8 Yet, the use of peace conferences as such declined. Starting in the 1960s and 1970s, so-called global conferences became a more significant feature of the international landscape than conference diplomacy as previously construed. These conferences, often held in the stultifying atmosphere of the cold war, involved almost truly universal membership, dealt with conflict prevention only in an indirect manner, addressing the structural obstacles to sustainable peace.

During and after the end of the cold war, a major increase in intrastate conflict saw some new recourse to peace conferences. In the 1980s, the Contadora and Esquipulas peace process saw Latin American States acting jointly to end the Central American civil wars through a series of mediation and peace conference efforts. These sought to build a lasting peace in the region, establishing a common security of sorts.9The break-up of the former Yugoslavia engendered multiple conferences that aimed to end the conflict. Eventually, the Dayton conference held in 1995 succeeded in bringing the fighting to an end and laying the groundwork for Bosnia’s post-war development. The1990s and 2000s also saw a number of major peace conferences held for the Middle East: the Oslo conferences, the Madrid conferences and the Middle East Peace Summit held at Camp David are three prominent examples. These came close to establishing lasting peace between Israel and its neighbours, but were short-circuited by further outbreaks of conflict, illustrating the limitations of conferences in the contemporary context.

Drawing Lessons

What lessons can be drawn from this brief overview of the practice of conference diplomacy? Certainly, whereas early conferences eschewed any notion of sovereign equality, there is now the presumption that “general peace conferences” must include representation from all relevant States (and often non-state actors as well). This practice developed in parallel with multilateralism itself, though the inclusive nature of the peace conferences at The Hague predated the founding of the League of Nations. Given the difficulties that a consensus-based approach had engendered in The Hague—where 44 sovereign States were brought together to represent “the conscience of the civilized world”—this development had not been inevitable.10 At the same time, the conferences at The Hague indicated to diplomats, who offered the lesson to their successors, that there was a certain benefit in coming together in a setting apart from regular diplomatic channels to take a fresh look at well-known problems. In addition, while we think of the formation of international networks underpinned by personal ties as a modern-day preoccupation, the development of a shared spirit, which in general underwrote the aims of the conferences at The Hague (despite eventual setbacks), did in fact give rise to a network of diplomats that later cooperated in establishing the League of Nations.11

On the other hand, when States aim to set the terms of a newly brokered peace, or attempt to conclude a still-simmering conflict, reflexive reliance on conference diplomacy, unless carefully managed, can prove counterproductive. Historians will long debate the failings of the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which suffered from the decision to hold a conference so soon after the conclusion of a major war, and with limited membership.

Less novel than in the days of Metternich, a contemporary critique of conference diplomacy is that—when focused primarily on ongoing conflicts—as in Syria, the convening of a conference demonstrates the pressure for leading States to “do something”, rather than a considered diplomatic approach.12

Diplomats should be wary of resorting to conferences, which inevitably generate significant media attention, when a clear strategy is lacking. In many instances, traditional diplomacy, as in the mediation of the European Union between Serbia and Kosovo, may be more appropriate than the convening of a major conference intended to apply strategic pressure to parties (or potential parties) to a conflict.

Looking Ahead

To be effective as an instrument in the coming decades, conference diplomacy must take into account the nature of contemporary conflict. The number of non-state conflicts has risen from approximately 15 recorded instances in 1989 to 38 in 2011,13 and battle deaths in these types of conflict increased more than threefold between 2007 and 2011, from approximately 2,000 to more than 6,000 reported deaths per year. Increasingly, when conferences are convened, they ought to take account of the variety of actors involved in contemporary conflict, or with a stake in it, including non-state armed groups (which may be proscribed terrorist organizations) and civil society organizations (which are often given the opportunity to observe international peace conferences but are seldom able to participate).

(Video) Conference on Strengthening Preventive diplomacy and Multilateral Negotiation

If the ambition of multilateral conference diplomacy is to serve as an effective tool for conflict prevention and to create and implement sustainable peace, it will be pivotal to involve all parties in multilateral peace conferences—both those driving conflict and those impacted by it. In the light of the multitude of challenges threatening international peace and security, Bertrand G. Ramcharan suggests that “the time might be opportune to convene an international peace conference to modernise the architecture of peace and security in the twenty-first century.”14 His suggestion is a timely one, and ought to be part of a wider conversation about global governance reform, including reform of the Security Council of the United Nations to enhance its ability to serve a preventive function. As we mark the 200th anniversary of the Congress of Vienna and the 70th anniversary of the United Nations, we must continue to innovate in our collective mission to prevent deadly conflict.


1 Mark Mazower, Governing The World: The History of An Idea (New York, Penguin, 2012), p. 3.

2 Bertrand G. Ramcharan, International Peace Conferences (Leiden, The Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff, 2015).

3 A.J.R. Groom, “Conference Diplomacy”, in The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, Andrew F. Cooper, Jorge Heine, and Ramesh Thakur, eds., (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 266–267.

4 Martha Finnemore and Michelle Jurkovich, “Getting a seat at the Table: The Origins of Universal Participation and Modern Multilateral Conferences”, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations,vol.20, No. 3 (July – September2014), pp. 361-373(363).

5 Ibid., pp. 363–365.

6 Stephen C. Schlesinger, Act of Creation: The Founding of the United Nations. A Story of Superpowers, Secret Agents, Wartime Allies and Enemies, and Their Quest for a Peaceful World (Boulder, Colorado, Westview, 2003), p. 21.

7 Groom, “Conference diplomacy”, p. 265.

8 Ramcharan, International Peace Conferences.

9 Michael Stevens and others, “Latin American Perspectives on Peace and Reconciliation”, in International Handbook of Peace and Reconciliation, Kathleen Malley-Morrison, Andrea Mercurio and Gabriel Twose, eds., Peace Psychology Book Series 7 (New York, Springer, 2013), pp. 561–79.

10 Arthur Eyffinger, The 1907 Hague Peace Conference: “The Conscience of the Civilized World” (The Hague, Judicap, 2007), Preface.

11 Mazower, Governing the World: The History of an Idea.

12 New Statesman, “The Syria peace talks are doomed before they have even begun”, 22 January 2014. Available from

13 Human Security Report Project, Human Security Report 2013. Available from

14 Ramcharan, International Peace Conferences.

The UN Chronicle is not an official record. It is privileged to host senior United Nations officials as well as distinguished contributors from outside the United Nations system whose views are not necessarily those of the United Nations. Similarly, the boundaries and names shown, and the designations used, in maps or articles do not necessarily imply endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.

Bridget Asiamah

Twenty Years of Progress Is Not Enough: We Must Act Now to End Obstetric Fistula

Obstetric fistula can be prevented when there is access to quality, comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services and information. Equally important to ending the condition is the availability and access to treatment when it occurs.

Edward Norton

Protecting the Tree of Life: The Path Forward

Though we humans share the earth with the rest of its life forms, and we are an integrated part of its biodiversity, wehave an outsized impact on the health of the planet.Recognizing our footprint and working earnestly towards sustainable existence within these systems, rather than dominating or destroying them, is the looming challenge of the twenty-first century.

(Video) What is a model United Nations Conference? #Diplomacy #Human Rights#International affairs

Bryan Stevenson

Countering the Legacy of Enslavement with Hope and Justice

As the world’s preeminent international organization, the United Nations is the only institution that can connect the multiple players and partners implicated in the global tragedy of the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans. It is thus appropriate and important that an institution like the United Nations take up the legacy issues surrounding the trade in enslaved Africans and centralize the importance of the story.

(Video) Postwar DIPLOMACY [APUSH Review Unit 7 Topic 14] Period 7: 1898-1945


How conference diplomacy is used in conflict prevention? ›

Three Types of Conference Diplomacy

Such conferences can contribute to conflict prevention by providing a forum for negotiation over the terms of a conflict's conclusion, as well as laying the ground for the development of sustainable peace.

How can diplomacy solve conflicts between nations? ›

Diplomatic efforts to resolve international conflicts constitute integral parts of the foreign policy and statecraft of the involved states; they invariably include negotiations; they engage professional diplomats, and rely on their mores and skills.

What is the conference method of diplomacy? ›

Conference diplomacy is a multilateral diplomatic negotiation process that is often part of an ongoing negotiation process within a multilateral organization. The multilateral organization protects the negotiation processes and this protection enhances the effectiveness of negotiation as an alternative to warfare.

What is preventive diplomacy at the United Nations? ›

Preventive diplomacy was presaged by Article 99 of the United Nations Charter, which allowed the Secretary-General to bring to the Security Council's attention threats to international peace and security.

How can we prevent conflict between two countries? ›

  1. Balance of Power.
  2. Hegemony.
  3. Diplomacy.
  4. Mediation.
  5. Diplomatic Sanctions.
  6. Fact-finding Mission.
  7. Preventive Measures.
  8. Coercive Measures.

Why is diplomacy considered important when dealing with other nations? ›

Different groups of people often come into conflict when a problem cannot be solved, when values clash, or when there is ambiguity over ownership of land and resources. Diplomacy, the art of maintaining peaceful relationships without the use of violence, can help turn conflict into cooperation.

Is diplomacy is the best way to solve international conflicts? ›

Diplomacy has solved conflicts, prevented deaths and economic turmoil, and secured peace . Think negotiation doesn't work? Here's a look at some critical times when it did.

What are the diplomatic ways of resolving conflict? ›

Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, often called ADR or alternative dispute resolution, are the most well known.

What are the characteristics of conference diplomacy? ›

Conference diplomacy means a constant exposure to legal texts. The lawyer is supposed to be capable of detecting subtle differences between one wording and another. He is supposed to be able to have a facility for the drafting of texts.

What is the conference method? ›

a method of personnel training in which participants work together in an attempt to resolve typical work-related problems and issues.

When did conference diplomacy begin? ›

The author traces the rudiments of “conference diplomacy” to the Congress of Vienna, 1815, which for the first time in history set the tone for addressing “common concerns” of States at an institutional level. This Congress, which was followed by other conferences, despite its many failures is said to have “…

What are examples of diplomatic methods? ›

Those methods are; signaling, conferences, agreements, make propagandas, get the rewards, coercions and negotiation. The methods of diplomacy always depend on the world leader's hands.

What is the role of the United Nations in preventing conflict among nations? ›

The United Nations plays an important role in conflict prevention, using diplomacy, good offices and mediation. Among the tools the Organization uses to bring peace are special envoys and political missions in the field.

Has diplomacy ever prevented a war? ›

Diplomacy is the primary tool of statecraft for good reason. Diplomats have averted and ended wars, bolstered human rights, and alleviated human suffering.

What are examples of purpose of diplomacy? ›

What are the main functions of diplomacy? As we've established, the main function of diplomacy is to ensure peaceful relations between countries. This might include negotiating trade deals, discussing mutual problems, implementing new policies, and tackling disputes.

What is the best way to prevent conflict with? ›

How to stop conflict before it starts
  1. Know your conflict style. When you have a disagreement with someone, what do you do? ...
  2. Form connections with others. Strengthening your relationships with others can help with preventing conflict. ...
  3. Communicate effectively. ...
  4. Reach out for help.
Apr 10, 2019

What are the examples of conflict prevention? ›

The notion of conflict prevention includes numerous activities such as con- flict avoidance and conflict resolution, with techniques such as media- tion, peace-keeping, peacemaking, confidence-building measures, and track-two diplomacy.

What is the best way to resolve conflict in country? ›

Some Ways to Resolve Conflicts
  1. Talk directly. Assuming that there is no threat of physical violence, talk directly to the person with whom you have the problem. ...
  2. Choose a good time. ...
  3. Plan ahead. ...
  4. Don't blame or name-call. ...
  5. Give information. ...
  6. Listen. ...
  7. Show that you are listening. ...
  8. Talk it all through.

What are the diplomatic ways of conflict resolution? ›

Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, often called ADR or alternative dispute resolution, are the most well known.

What is the role of public diplomacy in conflict resolution? ›

Although in itself will not be the sole solution for peace between the countries, public diplomacy can implement programs to strengthen mutual trust, both within countries with a high degree of risk and in areas with conflict potential.

What is preventive diplomacy in conflict management? ›

Preventive diplomacy refers to diplomatic action taken to prevent disputes from escalating into conflicts and to limit the spread of conflicts when they occur.

What is the purpose of Best Diplomats Conference? ›

Best Diplomats will give you a real illustration of how Diplomats works in Diplomatic environments such as of the United Nations, European Union or African Union and will train you on how to represent a country effectively in line with your foreign policy!


1. Diplomatic Simulation Program Tutorial
(National Museum of American Diplomacy)
2. Preventive diplomacy is absolutely vital to lasting peace - UN Secretary-General on Peace & Security
(United Nations)
3. Security Council President on Preventive Diplomacy for Central Asia | United Nations
(United Nations)
4. Understanding Geneva's Role in Peace Diplomacy
(Geneva Graduate Institute)
5. Making Preventive Diplomacy Work
(EastWest Institute)
6. Amb.Nebenzia on the centrality of preventative diplomacy, conflict prevention and resolution


Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Trent Wehner

Last Updated: 07/08/2023

Views: 6587

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Trent Wehner

Birthday: 1993-03-14

Address: 872 Kevin Squares, New Codyville, AK 01785-0416

Phone: +18698800304764

Job: Senior Farming Developer

Hobby: Paintball, Calligraphy, Hunting, Flying disc, Lapidary, Rafting, Inline skating

Introduction: My name is Trent Wehner, I am a talented, brainy, zealous, light, funny, gleaming, attractive person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.